차이

문서의 선택한 두 판 사이의 차이를 보여줍니다.

--- 정승환_컬럼:컴프레서의_디텍터_타입에대한_저의_생각 [2023/09/27] – 정승환
+++ 정승환_컬럼:컴프레서의_디텍터_타입에대한_저의_생각 [2023/09/27] (현재) – [IMHO of Compressor Detector Type] 정승환
@@ 줄 7: / 줄 7: @@
  제가 알아낸 것은, 오래전 전기 회로 측정에서는 피크 측정이 힘들었고, 그래서 RMS 측정만 가능해서 그렇게 밖에 제품을 만들 수밖에 없었다는 점 --[[정승환_컬럼:모든_것은_vu미터로부터_시작되었다|모든 것은 VU 미터로부터 시작되었다.]]
-특히, 장비의 성능 측정을 위한 AES17 표준은 사인파의 RMS를 이용해서 Peak 값을 유추해내는 방식입니다. 실질적으로 Peak 측정이 힘들어서 사용하는 방식입미다.
+피크 측정을 할 수 없었기 때문에, 장비의 성능 측정에서 사인파의 RMS를 측정하여 Peak 값을 유추하는 AES17 기준을 사용하기도 했습니다.
 또한 디텍터의 위치를 피드백 방식으로만 구현이 가능했다는 점입니다.
@@ 줄 25: / 줄 25: @@
 =====IMHO of Compressor Detector Type======
-I've also done a lot of research and study on the detector types of compressors.
+I've also done a lot of research and studying on compressor detector types.
-What I've found is that in the early days of electrical circuit measurements, it was difficult to measure peaks accurately, so the only option was to rely on RMS measurements. This limitation stemmed from the fact that precise peak measurement wasn't achievable due to technological constraints. This is why many products were developed with only RMS measurements. As you've mentioned, everything started from VU meters.
+What I've learned is that in the early days of electrical circuit measurements, it was challenging to measure peaks, so RMS measurements were the only viable option, which led to the creation of products based on RMS measurements—everything started with VU meters.
-Additionally, the position of the detector could only be implemented through feedback methods. For compressors to operate accurately, it's essential to check the input source (feedforward) and measure the exact "peak" of the source. Unfortunately, due to technological limitations, this couldn't be achieved at the time.
+Because peak measurements were not possible, AES17 standards were used to estimate peak values by measuring the RMS of a sine wave during equipment performance testing.
-Efforts were made to introduce opto-sensor methods to measure source peaks, but even then, it ultimately resulted in RMS measurements. (The opto-cell itself converts "power" into light, rather than representing the magnitude of voltage.) However, the term "peak reduction" is used in gain reduction.
+Additionally, detectors were implemented only in a feedback manner due to technical limitations.
-It's only recently, with modern products and digital plugins, that products capable of operating based on peak measurements have emerged. Feedforward methods have also become possible more recently.
+For a compressor to operate accurately, it is essential to check the input source (feedforward). Ideally, the compressor should measure the source's exact "peak," but due to a lack of technology at the time, this was not achievable.
-In the end, compressors need to be designed to measure the peak of the source and the state of the source using feedforward to achieve precise attack and release behavior as intended. It's true that these developments have occurred relatively recently.
+Efforts were made to measure the source's peak using opto-sensors, but ultimately, it resulted in RMS measurements, and the term "Peak reduction" is often used when discussing gain reduction.
+Nowadays, with the advent of modern products and digital plugins, devices that operate based on peak measurements have emerged.
+Feedforward methods have also become feasible only recently.
+In conclusion, it's true that compressors should be designed to measure the source's peak and the source's state for accurate attack and release behavior, but this level of functionality has only become widely available relatively recently.

[홈레코딩 필독서]"모두의 홈레코딩"구매링크